Recently, uncertainty about the future of Chelsea manager Enzo Maresca has sparked widespread concern. However, according to the British media, Chelsea’s top brass have chosen to support the Italian coach despite the team’s recent fluctuating performance. This decision may be puzzling to some fans, but there are actually multiple considerations behind it.
Maresca is still trusted by the top brass
Although Chelsea have not shown impressive performance under Maresca’s leadership, especially in some key matches, the club’s board of directors has not wavered in their trust in him. Inside sources revealed that Chelsea’s management still considers Maresca to be a dedicated and committed manager who has been working hard to keep the team competitive.
Statistically speaking, Maresca has been in the job for less than three years, but he is already the fourth official manager since the new owners took over. The frequency of the managerial changes shows the management’s previous dissatisfaction with the performance and style of play. However, this time they seem to want to focus on stability and no longer change easily.
A Chelsea insider told The Sun: “The consensus of the entire club is to make a concerted effort to return to the Champions League. The board of directors, the manager and the sports director have reached a high degree of agreement on this point. As long as Maresca maintains his current hardworking attitude, the management will not consider replacing him for the time being.”

Fans’ growing discontent
However, the reality is that fans feel very differently. After Chelsea’s 2-2 draw with Championship side Ipswich, the anger of the fans reached a new high. Many felt that such a performance would not allow the team to make a dent in the Premier League, let alone compete for Champions League qualification.
A large number of Chelsea fans on social media platform X (formerly Twitter) expressed their displeasure with Maresca. One comment read, “A team of giants who spent hundreds of millions of pounds on reinforcements, but have no offensive threat in the game, Maresca’s tactics are a disaster.” Some fans were also outspoken: “He must be sacked immediately, if this continues, we won’t even keep the top six.”
One commenter even wrote: “We played Ipswich to a draw and it was like losing. Why is anyone still saying Maresca is the right man for the job?” These types of queries are few and reflect a serious divide between fans and management in how they view the manager.
Why are the top brass still not moving him?
In the face of such intense external voices, why are Chelsea’s top management still insisting on supporting Maresca? On the one hand, they may realize that frequent managerial changes cannot really solve the team’s long-term problems. New coaches often need time to get used to their new position, and during this time, the team’s performance can hardly be improved.
On the other hand, Maresca’s reputation within the locker room is not low. Many young players are known to be supportive of his coaching style, especially in training and field command, and he has shown a rigorous and systematic way of working. The hierarchy may value his potential to build the team internally more than short-term results in terms of wins and losses.
In addition, considering the season is not yet over, there is a risk in making a hasty change of manager. If the new coach is unable to take over quickly and bring results, it may affect the team’s overall layout in Europe and the league.
This week’s matches are a key test
This week, Chelsea will have two key matches. The first is the UEFA Cup Quarter-Final second leg against Polish rivals Legia Warsaw on April 18th, followed by an away match against Fulham on the weekend, which will be a London derby in the Premier League.
These matches are not only important for the team to fight for this season’s honor, but also an important window to test Maresca’s coaching ability. If the team continues to perform poorly, the management may have to re-evaluate the current coaching situation.
Who can lead Chelsea out of the doldrums?
Now, the discussion around Maresca’s “suitability” is still hot in Chelsea fans’ circles. But the deeper problem is not just the manager, but the lack of direction at the club as a whole. The frequent coaching changes, the constant instability of the tactical system, the inexperience of young players, and the difficulty of implementing tactics, all of these need to be solved systematically.
Although the management has chosen to trust Maresca for the time being, if the club is still unable to qualify for the Champions League at the end of the season, I am afraid that this trust will come to an end.
Conclusion
Chelsea are at a critical crossroads. Whether to insist on stability and give Maresca more time to polish the team, or to listen to the fans’ voices and stop the damage in time, this is a crucial question for the club’s senior management. The final answer to this question is likely to be revealed at the end of the season.
Post Comment